July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Newsvine Top News

Reuters Headlines

  • Reuters Headlines

Best Books

Blog powered by TypePad

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

BlogTracker

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Saudis LIne Up For Space Flight With Virgin Galactic | Main | Iraq's Voyage Back To Normalcy - Thanks To The Surge »

    September 21, 2008

    Federal Reserve Allows Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs To Become Bank Holding Companies - Hoping Someone Shows Them The Money

    "Last major investment banks change status" from AP reports that  Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs have received permission from the Federal Reserve to change their status to bank holding companies - which potentially has saved them from being swept up by commercial banking entities. 

    This will allow the two entities to create commercial banks to take deposits. 

    The request for the change to bank holding companies was granted by a unanimous vote of the Fed's board of governors during a late Sunday meeting in Washington.

    The change of status means both companies will come under the direct regulation of the Federal Reserve, which regulates the nation's bank holding companies. The banking subsidiaries of the two institutions will face the stricter regulations that commercial banks are required to meet. Previously, the primary regulator for Goldman and Morgan Stanley was the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    "Goldman, Morgan Stanley to become regulated banks" from the Financial Times

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bc8c69e2010534c1fad3970c

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Federal Reserve Allows Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs To Become Bank Holding Companies - Hoping Someone Shows Them The Money:

    Comments

    The average person has no idea what an investment bank does, but will have to foot the bill for what the IBs have been doing. Perhaps saving them (and AIG) would cost less than letting them fail but by doing so the government has set a dangerous precedent.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment