July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Newsvine Top News

Reuters Headlines

  • Reuters Headlines

Best Books

Blog powered by TypePad

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

BlogTracker

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Jerome Corsi With Laura Ingraham | Main | Effectiveness In Journalism = Talk Radio »

    August 20, 2007

    The Secular Liberal Politics of Lilla-Putans, Courtesy Of the New York Times

    "The Politics of God" by Mark Lilla from the NY Times Magazine is a secularist's account of the nexus of religion and politics. that is firmly rebutted today in"It must be the end of secularism" by Spengler at AsiaTimes where the pompous faux rationalist gets his due.  Spengler goes through point by point to debunk the faulty factual and logical issues raised by Lilla and concludes that Lilla must be stuck in the 17th century and hasn't put forth evidence of the tyranny of Christianity - merely his dislike of it:

    Wink, wink, nudge, nudge. The adept readers of Professor Lilla's essay, the diehards of liberal secularism, know that Christianity is the enemy, no matter how docile, peaceful, quiescent and non-threatening it might appear. Christianity is guilty until proven innocent; the peaceful intentions of all Christian denominations toward one another and to non-Christian religions merely disguise an irrepressible urge toward violence, in the perverse view of the Lilla-Putans.

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bc8c69e200e54ee1fc378834

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Secular Liberal Politics of Lilla-Putans, Courtesy Of the New York Times:

    Comments

    I felt it was a very bad article! Lilla fails to understand history and makes up a convenient new category of 'political theology' instead of tackling the irelationship between politics and ideology and understanding what theology is. Not to mention his treatment of morality which he separates from religion so that he can attack religion. The article is flawed on many accounts. For more you can check my blog http://paswonky.blogspot.com

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment